Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 02:17

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What do you think about wearing sheer pantyhose?
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Can someone write me a sex story?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
"Can't Believe Virat Kohli Knew...": RCB's Celebrations Amid Stampede Row Heats Up - NDTV Sports
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
tvOS 26 hints at a big hardware change for the new Apple TV 4K - 9to5Mac
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
The Best Late-Night Snack to Lower Cholesterol, According to Dietitians - EatingWell
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Do you have pics of the wife making out with another guy?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Utah now one of 36 states that have seen measles cases this year - Deseret News